CADET EVALUATION FORM

ACT Class:
Mission Used:
Mission Start Date:
Mission End Date:

* Commanding Officer
# Player Name:
# Character Name:
# E-Mail Address:

* Executive Officer
# Player Name:
# Character Name:
# E-Mail Address:

ATTENTION! IMPORTANT INFORMATION BELOW!

The Starfleet Chief of Operations will now contact the Commanding Officer in charge of the vessel of each successful graduate and tell him/her to get in contact with said cadet. If you have successfully graduated and don't hear from your new Commanding Officer within a week, please send a mail to your Instructors and/or the Director of ACT and/or the Starfleet Chief of Operations.

On the other hand, your new Commanding Officers will only wait for a limited time when sending out their introductory mails to you. If you don't reply within a maximum of three weeks (you *should* reply much earlier than that) you will be considered dropped out and will have to go through retraining.

Steve Peterson
Director of Advanced Command Training

CLASS ROSTER

EVALUATION OF THE --Ops-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

EVALUATION OF THE --Sec/Tac-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

EVALUATION OF THE --CEO-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

EVALUATION OF THE --CMO-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

EVALUATION OF THE --FCO-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

EVALUATION OF THE --Cns-- POSITION

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) QUANTITY OF POSTING (During Mission Time)
# Posts of less than 500 words are not to be counted in this part of the evaluation.

5) Averages four (4) or more posts per week.
4) Averages three (3) posts per week.
3) Averages two (2) posts per week.
2) Averages one (1) post per week (with good explanation)
1) Averages one (1) post per week (without sufficient reason)
0) Averages less than one (1) post per week.

Mark:
Reason:

B) FORMAT

5) Always has perfect format.
4) Rarely has minor format errors. (Errors in SIGNATURE / SUBJECT LINE/SCENE/LOCATION)
3) Rarely has major format errors. (Errors in MAILING STRING / CONT'D FROM / NRPGs to MODERATOR / MISSING SECTIONS)
2) Occasionally has major format errors OR semi frequent minor format errors.
1) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
0) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

C) GRAMMAR

5) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
4) Near perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and not showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure are below FRPG standards.
0) Spelling, gramatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult.

Mark:
Reason:

D) DEPTH OF STORY

5) Always puts out high quality, involving posts which encourage others to participate.
4) Posts add to mission consistently and involve other player.
3) Posts add to mission OR involves other players.
2) Posts impare mission OR rarely involves other players.
1) Repeated backposting OR posts which greatly hinder storyline/plot.
0) Repeated grandstanding OR posts always hinder/confuse storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

E) CHARACTER
# This involves how the player writes for his/her character's abilities and attitude.
# Character's attitude should not be penalised unless it *impares* story depth and/or the mission.

5) Character attitude / abilities will add greatly to the FRPG collective.
4) Character will fit in nicely with the FRPG.
3) Character is interesting though occasionally one dimentional.
2) Character occasionally impairs storyline/plot.
1) Character frequently impairs storyline/plot.
0) Character constantly impairs storyline/plot.

Mark:
Reason:

Overall Evaluation:

Marks-
A) QUANTITY-
B) FORMAT-
C) GRAMMAR-
D) DEPTH-
E) CHARACTER-
OVERALL TOTAL=

Overall Standing in Class:

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to the fleet.
___ be retrained.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED) :
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED) :

ACTi Comments:

To download a simple text copy of this ACT Evaluation Form, please right-click here and select "save-as".

A more complex, heavily annotated version of this form can be found in the ACT Instructor Manual.

The Cadet Evaluation Form was last updated stardate 2.31010.1849
Copyright (C) The Federation Role Playing Game. All Rights Reserved.