Resolution 2006-03: Creation of Phase 1 Cadet Evaluation Form

The Federation Role-Playing Game Phase 1 Cadet Evaluation Form:
********************************************************************

Class:
Scenario Used:
Training Start Date:
Training End Date:

* Senior Instructor
# Player Name:
# Character Name:
# E-Mail Address:

* Junior Instructor
# Player Name:
# Character Name:
# E-Mail Address:

********************************************************************
ATTENTION! IMPORTANT INFORMATION BELOW!

The Starfleet Chief of Operations will now contact the Commanding Officer in charge of the vessel, the successful graduate of phase 1 is assigned to complete phase 2 and tell him/her to get in contact with said cadet. If you have successfully passed phase 1 and don't hear from your new Commanding Officer within a week, please send an email to your Instructors and/or
the Director of ACT and/or the Starfleet Chief of Operations.

On the other hand, your new Commanding Officers will only wait for a limited time when sending out their introductory mails to you. If you don't reply within a maximum of three weeks (you *should* reply much earlier than that) you will be considered dropped out and will have to go through retraining.

Ranjani Sabarinathan
Director of Advanced Command Training

********************************************************************
CADET EVALUATION
********************************************************************

Player's name:
Character's name:
E-mail address:

A) FORMAT

4) Always has perfect format.
3) Rarely has any format errors and always learns from corrections.
2) Frequent format errors, seldom learns from corrections.
1) Always has format errors, never learns from corrections.

Mark:
Reason:

B) GRAMMAR

4) Perfect spelling, grammar and sentence structure.
3) Occasionally flawed, but showing improvements.
2) Flawed and rarely showing signs of improvements.
1) Spelling, grammatical errors and/or sentence structure make reading of posts difficult and showing no signs of improvements.

Mark:
Reason:

C) READABILITY
-This section covers items such as whether the writer placed a space between paragraphs or placed dividers between scene/post body and nrpg; understandability of the post.

4) Posts are always easy to read and understand.
3) Occasionally the posts had no space between paragraphs, scenes.
2) Often posts were found to have no space between paragraphs, scenes, but shows signs of improvement towards the end.
1) Posts are always difficult to read and understand, with no signs of improvement shown.

Mark:
Reason:

D) LENGTH

4) Posts are always above the minimum requirement.
3) Posts always around 500 words
2) Posts have gone below 500 words, though the player managed to get the length above the minimum requirement towards the end.
1) Posts are too short (always below 500 words)

Mark:
Reason:


********************************************************************
Overall Evaluation:
********************************************************************

Marks-

A) FORMAT-
B) GRAMMAR-
C) READABILITY-
D) LENGTH-

OVERALL TOTAL=

My recommendation is that he/she should:

___ be sent on to Phase 2.
___ be retrained in Phase 1.
___ be removed from active role-play. (To be used only in extreme circumstances)

-Desired Positions (2 REQUIRED):
-Proposed Positions (2 REQUIRED):
-Desired Units (2 REQUIRED)- Optional:

ACTi Comments:

--

Outcome:

Unanimously approved